A fifth robocall fraud lawsuit has been filed in opposition to Household First Life.

Plaintiff Robert Salomon filed go well with in opposition to FFL in Connecticut on March twentieth.

In his class-action Criticism, Salomon alleges that “First Household Life [sic] makes telemarketing calls to people on the Nationwide Do Not Name Registry.”

Saloman claims Household First Life contacted him on a non-commercial, private residential quantity, purportedly “listed on the Nationwide Do Not Name Registry since November 2022.”

Regardless of by no means being a Household First Life buyer or consenting to obtain calls from them, Saloman alleges FFL positioned two telemarketing calls on his quantity on January nineteenth, 2023.

Each calls adopted an identical script, which marketed that they have been calling for Household First.

They requested the Plaintiff what his age was and if he was in search of insurance coverage.

The Plaintiff was not and terminated the decision.

Regardless of this, the Plaintiff obtained the identical name about an hour later.

Through the second name, the Plaintiff obtained the title of the Defendant’s worker that she was speaking to, which was Ashley Pennymen.

Ashley Pennymen doesn’t have a digital footprint, suggesting it could be a pseudonym.

Saloman claims FFL’s unsolicited calls triggered him “aggravation, nuisance and invasions of privateness”.

Citing violations of the Phone Client Safety Act, Saloman seeks to characterize a category of members who’ve additionally acquired unsolicited telemarketing calls from Household First Life.

Plaintiff and all members of the Courses have been harmed by the acts of Defendant, together with, however not restricted to, the invasion of their privateness, annoyance, waste of time, the usage of their phone energy and community bandwidth, and the intrusion on their phone that occupied it from receiving reliable communications.

If granted, Saloman’s proposed class motion seeks an injunction in opposition to FFL, prohibiting additional contacting of numbers on the Do Not Name Registry.

Damages of $500 for every particular person violation can also be being sought ($1500 per “figuring out or willful violation).

Household First Life filed its reply to Saloman’s Criticism on June twelfth.

A June sixteenth scheduling order has set a June twenty fourth, 2024 deadline for a category certification submitting.

Of the 5 current robocall fraud lawsuits filed in opposition to Household First Life and father or mother firm Integrity Advertising and marketing Group, two have been settled (case 1 and case 2).

The third and fourth circumstances, filed by Plaintiffs Mark Dobronski and Aaron Rapp respectively, are nonetheless taking part in out.