Accused lady drugger and sexual assaulter Michael Bjorkman, has sued Exp Realty and CEO Glenn Sanford for defamation and unpaid wages.
Bjorkman (proper) filed his first Criticism in opposition to Exp Realty in Spokane County, Washington on April twelfth. An Amended Criticism, including CEO Glenn Sanford, was filed on April nineteenth.
As per Bjorkman’s Amended Criticism, he signed on as an Exp Realty agent in September 2018. Bjorkman (proper) was terminated in September 2020, because of undisclosed “controversy”.
The “controversy” Bjorkman references pertains to alleged drugging and sexual assault of ladies relationship again to 2000.
Bjorkman’s alleged conduct has since resulted in two separate pending lawsuits filed in opposition to him in California; one in March 2023 and one other in December.
Bjorkman was additionally arrested on two counts of sexual assault pertaining to allegations made within the March 2023 lawsuit. Prices in opposition to Bjorkman nevertheless had been dropped in Could.
Exp Realty was just lately dismissed as a Defendant within the December 2023 lawsuit however in any other case the end result of each circumstances stays pending.
Bjorkman claims, after he was terminated, that he entered right into a Settlement Settlement with Exp Realty.
The settlement required EXP to pay [Bjorkman’s] “income share” as outlined by the Impartial Contractor Settlement (“ICA”) on an accelerated foundation.
The settlement states;
As of the Efficient Date, EXP will speed up the vesting of Agent’s Income Share, as outlined within the ICA, as if the Agent had been an impartial gross sales agent with EXP for 3 (3) years as of the ICA Termination Date.
…
If Agent associates with a competitor of EXP, Agent loses his capability to earn the eXponential share portion of his income share.
As well as, if any of the next are true, EXP will stop to pay Agent both the eXpansion share, eXponential share, or each:
- Agent is convicted of a criminal offense;
- if Agent commits or makes an attempt to commit or admits to committing acts of ethical turpitude which are inconsistent with EXP’s core values; or
- Agent has engaged in authorized motion in opposition to EXP or acted in a fashion that facilitates authorized motion in opposition to EXP.
Bjorkman claims Exp Realty started paying him in April 2021 however then stopped in March 2022.
Alleges Bjorkman;
After the March 23, 2022 cost, no different funds had been made.
Defendant subsequently, breached the settlement in failing to pay wages due and owing.
I can’t communicate to Exp Realty’s “core values” however, allegedly upon being knowledgeable of Bjorkman’s alleged drugging and sexual assault of feminine Exp Realty brokers, CEO Glenn Sanford reportedly advised a Board Member it “was not their drawback”.
Even when Exp Realty is okay with its prime Brokers drugging and sexually assaulting ladies, Bjorkman’s alleged conduct has resulted in Exp Realty being named as a defendant within the two California lawsuits.
Thus so far as I can see, in mild of his alleged conduct, Bjorkman ought to have by no means been paid following his termination. Bjorkman evidently sees in any other case and claims Exp Realty ceasing his post-termination funds as “illegal”.
Pertaining to his post-termination funds, Bjorkman has gone after Exp Realty and Sanford for:
- failure to pay wages owed;
- willful refusal to pay wages;
- breach of contract;
- unjust enrichment; and
- breach of excellent religion and truthful dealing
Bjorkman additionally accuses of Sanford of defamation.
On November 2, 2023, Exp Realty, LLC held its “eXp World Holding Q3 2023 Outcomes” name with buyers.
Throughout that decision, the civil lawsuits in opposition to Mr. Bjorkman, Exp Realty and Glenn Sanford got here up.
The query and response had been as follows:
[Editor’s note: there is nothing in the filing depicting the referenced “question and response” above]
Based mostly on data and perception, Plaintiff believes that one of many two “dangerous actors” referenced within the assertion refers to him.
As I perceive it, Sanford fielded a query on the 2 alleged drugging and sexual assault lawsuits, prompting him to not directly confer with Bjorkman and alleged co-conspirator David Golden as “dangerous actors”.
Particular statements attributed to Sanford later in Bjorkman’s swimsuit embody:
- “We imagine we had two actors, two dangerous actors.”
- “and that they’d acted considerably inappropriately, to the purpose the place, , there doubtless might have and, who is aware of, should still be jail time related to it.”
- “discover credible proof that claims persons are doing issues which are doing issues [sic] which are on the incorrect facet of the legislation, then we do launch brokers.”
Bjorkman maintains he has been falsely accused.
By calling Bjorkman a “dangerous actor” who engaged in conduct that would end in “jail time”, and referencing the lawsuit, Mr. Sanford primarily advised the entire buyers on the decision that Mr. Bjorkman dedicated these acts.
He additionally acknowledged that he has “credible proof” that Mr. Bjorkman engaged in such horrible acts.
Nonetheless, these statements are false and Mr. Sanford knew or ought to have identified that they’re false.
To start out, he brazenly admits that they “nonetheless … don’t even know what the story could be.”
Additional, the “dispute” referenced in paragraph 6-8 had been the felony allegations that had been initially leveraged in opposition to Mr. Bjorkman, which had been dismissed because the prosecutor decline to cost Mr. Bjorkman.
Bjorkman goes on to level out that, regardless of the allegations in opposition to him, Exp Realty
signed him onto the compensation acceleration settlement that’s a part of the contract dispute.
It was solely after public stress mounted in opposition to Exp Realty that they stopped paying Mr. Bjorkman and did so solely as a public relations and advertising transfer, understanding there’s inadequate proof supporting the claims int he underlying civil matter.
Mr. Sanford primarily referred to as Mr. Bjorkman a intercourse trafficker and rapist on a publicly posted earnings name.
Right here Bjorkman’s lawsuit cites an internet stream of Exp Realty’s investor name, posted to the corporate’s official YouTube channel on November third, 2023.
Bjorkman alleges Sanford claiming to have “credible proof” of him “engag[ing] in intercourse trafficking and rape” is “defamation per se.”
On account of being referred to as a intercourse trafficker and a rapist in entrance his whole former firm and nationwide buyers, after which posted on-line for all to see, Mr. Bjorkman has suffered vital and noneconomic damages.
In his prayer for aid, Bjorkman seeks:
- a financial award of double damages;
- financial damages pertaining to Sanford’s alleged defamatory assertion;
- a minimum of $20 million usually damages;
- pre-judgment and post-judgment curiosity; and
- authorized prices
Keep tuned for updates as BehindMLM continues to trace the case.
